Search for: "US v. Stephen Rosenberg"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
It may be useful to model business behavior in economic terms that assume profit-making as an “objective function. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The urn model of probability, however, gives us some insight into attributability. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 3:06 pm
This, as political scientists and historians are taught in graduate school, is a major controversy with Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope laying down a challenge that has never been fully answered to demonstrate powerful political effects from the judicial decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, University of Wisconsin-Madison (elizabeth@wisc.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu)South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu)South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University (tatiana.seijas@rutgers.edu)Latin America… [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:13 am
Nathaniel Sobel analyzed the recent Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am
Justice Stephen Breyer seemed frustrated with West Virginia as well. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
In other Supreme Court news, Peter Margulies assessed the oral arguments in Sessions v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Joshua Rosenberg. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
" (But three suffice).United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:09 am
See Rosenberger v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 7:34 pm
In R. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
The first is Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm
At the Miami Herald, Carol Rosenberg asks what will become of Guantanamo under President Trump. [read post]
