Search for: "US v. Walgreen Co." Results 1 - 20 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Vocational evidence may be used to address issues relevant to the determination of permanent disability. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am by Levin Papantonio
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:42 am by Dan Bressler
It also accused the arbitrator, from the JAMS arbitration forum, of using a flawed model to assess alleged damages. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm by John Elwood
Walgreen Co., and the government recommended that Hardison be reconsidered and overruled in that case. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:45 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Walgreen National Corporation, 2022WL16552820, case number 2:21-CV-20236 filed October 31, 2022. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 10:28 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The panel then found that the customer-plaintiffs in the J&S suit lacked standing to sue for damages under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Walgreen Co., 18-349, involving employers’ need to make accommodations to their employees’ religious observance; Alito, joined by Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch, filed an opinion concurring in the denial. [read post]