Search for: "United States v. Briscoe"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:31 am
Case date: 07 November 2019 Case number: No. 19-4046 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
Briscoe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Elite Logistics, Inc., in 2007, the 10th Circuit sat en banc to review discrimination claims by an employee who alleged that his employer suspended him from work until he produced documentation of his right to work in the United States, and then fired him after he produced the documentation and demanded an apology. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
SEC ALJs carry out “important functions,” and “exercis[e] significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 3:28 am
Bandimere, Petitioner, v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:42 am
Phillips 66 Co., October 17, 2016, Briscoe, M.). [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
Warren Bridge and Briscoe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
United Reporting (1999)). [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm
United States decision regarding the extent of Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm
(Nussbaum, p. 76) The constitutionality of this evasive set of maneuvers went all the way up to the Supreme Court, and in Briscoe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
