Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 1 - 20
of 9,757
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 2:50 am
Trans Union, LLC – A Win for Consumer Protection In a notable decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the case of Sessa v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:39 am
In Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
Adding to this constriction of avenues for environmental regulation is the rights of corporations to engage in political speech, following the 2010 decision Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
In particular, we have to distinguish specific questions of original meaning from more general—and, here, more relevant—questions of original law: that is, the law of the United States as it stood at the Founding, and as it's been lawfully changed to the present day. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
The Court disagreed, ruling that “an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm
The burden of proof lies with the defendant. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
