Search for: "United States v. Deluca"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
January 5, 2023 | By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:03 pm
Deluca v Brown The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided a case on April 3, 2018 that changed how the VA decides claims based solely upon pain. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of DeLuca v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
United States, 597 F. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:39 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:11 am
In the same debate, Fetterman endorsed codifying Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:39 am
United States, 870 F. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
” Giles v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
