Search for: "United States v. Henning et al" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” Likewise, in The World Bank Comparative International Study of Court Performance Indicators, A Descriptive and Analytic Account, Buscaglia et al. state: “[t]here is a growing awareness that a judiciary able to resolve cases in a fair and timely manner is an important prerequisite for economic development. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
KENNETH KAYSER, et al., Appellees. : : : Case No. 3:19-cv-00363 : : Judge Thomas M. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Patrick McDonnell
§§ 948a et seq.] may be convened by the Secretary of Defense or by an officer or official of the United States designated by the Secretary for that purpose” (emphasis added by the court). [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
These expensive and potentially efficiency-reducing measures are not installed in the United States (though here there are other more “standard” precautions). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]