Search for: "United States v. Hoskin" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
Cherokee Nation Election Commission (Cherokee Nation Election Commission) In re Hoskins, In re Watts (Cherokee Nation Election Commission) In re Comingdeer (Attorney's Fees; Cherokee Nation Election Commission) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Taryn M. v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm by NARF
Perez (Cultural Resources; Native American Graves Protection Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Matter of Welfare of Children A.J.J. ( Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) In re M. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:12 pm by Unknown
State of Alaska (Indian Child Welfare Act) Klein v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:22 am
Perhaps most notable are changes made to account for the Second Circuit’s 2018 decision (in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that this qualifying phrase was intended to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:19 am
On August 24, 2018, in a rare, 73-page decision interpreting the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s an excerpt: The Second Circuit ruled on August 24 in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Since the precipitous drop in United States law school enrolments began close to a decade ago, enrolments system wide have been cut in half. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
 It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
But I couldn’t help thinking of that line when I read a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]