Search for: "United States v. Recognition Equipment Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Servaas, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:44 pm
See Fellowes, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
In 1982, the Ministry filed a claim against Cubic for breach of contract with the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am
Pierre-Louis cited to the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellees, Teladoc, Inc. v Texas Medical Board, No. 16-50017 (5th Cir. filed Sept. 9, 2016). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Taking advantage of the recognition that a complainant has created for its mark is not a bona fide offering of goods or services, but there has to be proof of targeting not simply an allegation, Target Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
We findMallinckrodt’s principle to remain sound after the SupremeCourt’s decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am
Bobrick Wash- room Equip., Inc., 527 F.3d 1379, 1381 (Fed. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
Belship Navigation, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:46 am
In QPro Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
Khan is Legal Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:12 am
See First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:05 am
In the past year, several Federal Circuit decisions defined situations in which software inventions could be eligible for patenting in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm
Adegbile, the Director of Litigation at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. [read post]
