Search for: "United States v. Stuart"
Results 1 - 20
of 477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
United States TikTok and ByteDance have initiated legal action against the US government, challenging a recently enacted law that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sells the company off in the next nine months to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
United States has come to an unceremonious end and all Americans should be concerned. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Consistent with Guideline 7 of the 2023 Merger Guidelines, the FTC notes that over the last decade, Tapestry has already consolidated Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman and that Capri has consolidated Michael Kors, Versace and Jimmy Choo. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
” As stated by Stuart E. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” Stuart Harrow, a Defense Department employee, was furloughed because of budget shortfalls. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am
The decision in Porter v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 1:02 pm
SEC, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
In Tapis International v INS , 94 F. [read post]
