Search for: "United States v. United States Sugar Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am by Abby Meyer
Rite Aid Corp., Case No. 2:17-cv-06777 (C.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
Christmas is over with lumps of coal and sugar plums distributed in ways that often seem unrelated to who has been naughty or nice. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am by Mark Walsh
The case is about whether challenges to a federal regulation known as the “waters of the United States” rule must be filed in federal district courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:55 am by Larry
" In a case called United States v. [read post]