Search for: "University Medical Center v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am by Neil Hamilton and Louis Bilionis
NB: These ideas were initially worked out in an open-access Cambridge University Press book that we have authored, titled Law Student Professional Development and Formation: Bridging Law School, Student, and Employer Goals (2022). [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by Schachtman
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by admin
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Higher Earning ‘Elite’ Political Lobbyists Overstate Their Own Achievements, Study Shows Phys.org – University of Exeter | Published: 11/6/2019 Research from the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom shows high-earning lobbyists living in Washington, D.C. with congressional experience, and who engage in a broader range of activities, were more likely than other lobbyists to inflate their success. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Though Black never graduated from high school, he briefly attended medical school before switching to the University of Alabama Law School, where he graduated Phi Beta Kappa in 1906. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The anti-SLAPP law (as it is called) was recently invoked by the University of California to try to get rid of a sexual harassment suit brought against it by a woman medical resident at the UC Davis Medical Center. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Supp.2d at 156-57.Finally, there’s Community Health Center v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Sullivan, state tort law of defamation has been limited by federal constitutional principles. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:33 pm by Peter Breslauer
Four employees of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and related entities (“UPMC”) filed a proposed collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:46 am by Joy Waltemath
In consolidated claims before the Third Circuit, the court ruled that named plaintiffs in an FLSA collective action who voluntarily dismissed their individual claims with prejudice could not appeal a district court order denying final certification of the collective action (Camesi v University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, September 4, 2013, Rendell, M). [read post]