Search for: "Vivek Reddy"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2008, 11:31 am
While Vivek Reddy has argued here that our Constitution indeed provides for greater Central role in tackling terrorism, there are equally valid arguments why in a cooperative federalism like ours, it makes sense to involve the States on tackling federal crimes. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:53 pm
Saksena's points struck me as being very similar to the ones that Vivek Reddy has made before on this blog. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
In the comments section of the previous post, Vivek Reddy has this to say while discussing the Coelho case: "One interesting thing about the Ninth Schedule judgment is that it was a unanimous judgment. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 2:09 am
Vivek Reddy's most-admired piece seems to have contributed to a healthy debate on the subject of recusals. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 7:23 am
Like Reddy and Robinson, Andhyarujina's remarks also appear to have been stimulated by his exposure to a different way of doing things. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:46 am
In the last post on GST, Adithya Reddy highlighted some speeches by members of the Constituent Assembly. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:02 am
The special issue starts on page 15 and ends on page 20.)The issue was a result of a detailed in-house effort (with inputs from Sidharth Chauhan, and Vivek Reddy who also blogs here). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:07 pm
Sitapati's article, however, cites constitutional experts Sudhir Krishnaswamy (teaching at the National Law School, Bangalore) and Vivek Reddy (on this blog) to show how Patil's interpretation of Article 254(2) and the principles of federalism may be misplaced. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 11:23 pm
Arun and Mr.Vivek Reddy and all responses are similar. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 7:14 am
Only recently in our blog, our co-bloggers, Arun Thiruvengadam and Vivek Reddy were discussing the deteriorating quality of judgments of our Superior courts, citing an article written in EPW by A.G.Noorani. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Vivek Reddy, Advocate, Supreme Court of India (The Constitutionality of Tribunalisation) Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:38 pm
It is becoming clear that our judiciary needs to urgently formulate an official policy on recusals, given the alarming frequency with which problem cases are arising in the Supreme Court alone.Two of the more insightful pieces of commentary on the issue - by Vivek Reddy and TR Andhyarujina - make references to the unusual memorandum issued by Justice Scalia in March 2004 in what has come to be known as the 'duck hunting' fiasco. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:35 am
The piece below benefited greatly from discussions with Balaji Subramanium, Rupali Samuel, Vaneesha Jain, Prashant Reddy and Vivek Reddy. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 11:39 am
Alternatively, if any of our readers are in the know of this decision, please do let us know.As to whether or not an appellate court hearing this particular compulsory licensing matter will adopt the above ruling and reopen all issues of fact (and perhaps even remand the case to a freshly instituted copyright board for specific factual determinations) remains to be seen.ps: many thanks to Vivek Reddy for pointers on the TRAI decision and the standard of review. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm
CIL nominated Justice BP Jeevan Reddy as its arbitrator. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
Vivek Tankha, Additional Solicitor General, however, contended that Section 30 granted an independent right to file an appeal against the final decision or order of the Tribunal and that Section 31 was only providing an additional mode for approaching this Court with the leave of the Tribunal. [read post]
