Search for: "W Bruening" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm by Christine Kexel Chabot
As she noted, “[w]hen the Constitution’s text does not provide a limit to a coordinate branch’s power, we should not lightly assume that Article III implicitly directs the Judiciary to find one. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am by Guest Author
As she noted, “[w]hen the Constitution’s text does not provide a limit to a coordinate branch’s power, we should not lightly assume that Article III implicitly directs the Judiciary to find one. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:32 am by Eugene Volokh
[W]e agree with the Third Circuit that Bruen's scattered references to 'law-abiding' and 'responsible' citizens did not implicitly decide the issue in this case. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:31 am by fjhinojosa
Smotherman, More Rights, More Responsibilities: A Post-Bruen Proposal for Concealed Carry Compromise, 2024 WIS. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 2022) ("[W]e cannot say that an individual's public housing unit is analogous to that of other established sensitive government buildings [for purposes of Bruen] …. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
That argument conflates Bruen's two distinct analytical steps. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am by fjhinojosa
The title of his presentation was “Litigating under Bruen. [read post]
Bruen, which stated: [W]hen the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct…[T]he government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Affirmatively Disclosing Agency Legal Materials September 11, 2023 | Bernard W. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Bruen, which held that “[w]hen the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
Second, even if the categorical prohibitions enacted in the twentieth century can be used as precedents consistent with Bruen, they still don't rescue 922(g)(8)(C)(ii), which is a unique infringement. [read post]