Search for: "WELLS v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 74,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
If you call 911 to report you have taken hostages and already killed two of them, and then confront the police while holding a machete, that is probably not going to end well. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
In In Re Jackson, Judge Leval applied this approach to a right of publicity claim, but it is applicable to any state law cause of action, and in X v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
We wish to take this opportunity to look back on the eventful journey that the European Union and the United Kingdom have embarked on in judicial cooperation since Brexit (I.) as well as to venture a look ahead on what may be expected from the prospective collaboration within and perhaps even alongside the HCCH system (II.). [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
The case emerged from complaints by Nebraskans that the state was improperly subjecting mental health patients to segregation from general society, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the 1999 US Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 8:49 am by Steven Cohen
Summary: Construction Expert Witness testimony excluded because the court ruled that the expert cannot state that the Chinese drywall caused the plaintiffs’ injuries Facts: This case (Fozard et al v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
He communicated with Republican officials and elector candidates in the six contested states, as well as Trump lieutenant Rudy Giuliani. [read post]