Search for: "Walker v. State of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
There are plenty of advantages to practicing business divorce litigation in New York. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 The third lawsuit, known as the Lema case, sued the City of New York under Section 1983, was dismissed without prejudice as premature. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm by Josh Blackman
But nothing will change with the ability of California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, Maryland, New York, and other states to obtain nationwide relief. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Back the case goes to the Eastern District of New York to resolve the motion properly. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the Southern District of New York, “[a]s the assembled case law reflects, to the extent that open-market securities fraud complaints use as the source for adverse factual allegations about a public issuer a report by a short seller — an entity with an economic interest in driving down the company’s stock price — these allegations must be considered with caution. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
New Technology Requires New Regulatory Ambitions October 9, 2023 | Kevin Frazier, Crump College of Law of St. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
" Just a year prior to the enactment of the Communications Decency Act, for example, a New York state court held an internet message board liable as a publisher of the defamatory comments made by third-party users of the site, declining to treat the platform as a distributor. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm by Kurt R. Karst
”[16]  However, the experience of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) should serve as a cautionary tale. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
New York City Department of Education, a summary order issued on November 13. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
In a recent article for the New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Cynthia Estlund, a professor at New York University School of Law, argued that technology has increased firms’ ability to replace workers, resulting in an erosion of workers’ bargaining power. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:00 am by Karen Tani
The fall schedule for the New York University School of Law Legal History Colloquium, co-convened by David Golove, Daniel Hulsebosch, and Noah Rosenblum, is now available:September 13 Reva Siegel, Nicholas deB. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner was charged by the New York State Department of Health [DOH] with patient abuse and neglect as defined under 10 NYCRR 81.1(a) and (c), respectively, in violation of Public Health Law §2803-d. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner was charged by the New York State Department of Health [DOH] with patient abuse and neglect as defined under 10 NYCRR 81.1(a) and (c), respectively, in violation of Public Health Law §2803-d. [read post]