Search for: "Waterhouse v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm by Barbara Moreno
Jason Pierceson, Before Bostock:  The Accidental LGBTQ Precedent of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” ““A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of actionhave occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court’” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Karen Tani
Hibbs (2003), as well as the leading Title VII sex-stereotyping case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
”In response, the Smiths filed claims against the landlord in the United States District Court of Colorado alleging wrongful discrimination predicated upon sexual identity, familial status, and sexual orientation.After a motion for summary judgment, the court found the owner liable for discrimination in violation of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Federal Fair Housing Act (FHA). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am by Matthew Dochnal
The United States Chamber of Commerce has consistently rated Delaware’s legal system as number one year after year. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 11:36 am by Jennifer Davis
Before Bostock: the accidental LGBTQ precedent of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:52 am by ernst
 It's now out in print, from the Cambridge University Press: Mark V. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, the Chairman of Price Waterhouse Coopers, Kevin Ellis, has gone as far as stating that ‘presenteeism is dead’ . [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
” Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Banks look at some of the history of martial law in the United States and say that, while unlikely, it is not impossible that a president facing the situation we now find ourselves in would declare martial law—but it would be wrong to do so. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am by Scott Bomboy
His appeal was denied by the 11th Circuit, but Bostock’s attorneys argued the circuit’s precedents conflicted with two United States Supreme Court decisions: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]