Search for: "Watkins v. Lee" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
SARANG DAMLE from Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC represented Ralph Oman. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, August 7, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Diversity, ESG, Listing standards, NASDAQ, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation Statement by Commissioners Lee and Crenshaw on Nasdaq’s Diversity Proposals Posted by Allison Herren Lee and Caroline Crenshaw, U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:45 pm by José Guillermo
Véase también el “dossier de prensa” en la sección “la institución” de la página web de Agenda: PERÚ. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
Potential Impact of New SEC Guidance on Performance Metrics on Disclosure of ESG Metrics Posted by Lee T. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Watkins, “holding that religious tests may not be used to decide who holds public office” Engel v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
The employer’s forensic computer expert examined a phone she produced and discovered many of the texts were in her “unsent” folder of drafts and were time-stamped a year after the alleged harassment, and she had “interspersed” bits of actual messages from the alleged harasser (Lee v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
((…) This court issued its decision in Lee v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
U.S.; related on mens rea, Orrin Hatch, Time] Court must resolve constitutionality of CFPB structure, especially now that DoJ itself agrees it’s unconstitutional [Thaya Brook Knight and Ilya Shapiro, more] In ineffective-assistance-of-counsel case that might hinge on whether drug defendant was bound to be convicted anyway, Court should not sidestep the historically significant phenomenon of jury nullification [Cato podcast with Tim Lynch on Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Devin Watkins discuss Buehler v. [read post]