Search for: "Weinstein v Levine" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, April 6, 2024 Tags: Climate Disclosure, order, SEC, securities act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2024 Annual Meeting Filing and Disclosure Requirements Posted by Brian V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, April 6, 2024 Tags: Climate Disclosure, order, SEC, securities act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2024 Annual Meeting Filing and Disclosure Requirements Posted by Brian V. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Judge Weinstein announced at the outset that he had studied the record from the Hall case, and that he would incorporate it into his record for the cases remanded to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am by Peter Mahler
  Just last week, the Appellate Division, Second Department in Weinstein v Levine applied the direct-derivative dichotomy to an issue that frequently arises in business divorce litigation when the defendants who control the company checkbook use company funds to pay their personal legal fees. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 161-162 [1st Dept 2005].) [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 The Court notably rejected extension of analogous grounds in cases like  Turpin, Généreux, Haig, Finita, Delisle, and Malmo-Levine. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
”)  Weinstein was demonstrably wrong in this assessment, just as anyone who held up L [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Supp.2d 230 (E.D.N.Y. 2007), Judge Weinstein (who literally “wrote the book” about federal evidence) held that a jury “may be guided” not only by partisan experts, but also by “the more neutral expert opinion of the FDA,” which had approved the product. [read post]