Search for: "Will Co., Ltd" Results 1 - 20 of 9,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2024, 6:52 am by Dan Bressler
White and his co-panelists found in favor of Morgan Stanley or other claimants in most cases but ruled against the firm in a customer dispute in 2019 in which the wirehouse was ordered to pay over $242,000. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Here’s how the merger unfolded: Early 2018: Moelis & Co., retained by FanDuel to explore financing options, projects that if sports betting were legalized in the U.S., FanDuel would earn more than $1.1 billion in annual revenue within five years. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Secondly, the court considered that, while no previous case has directly answered the question raised by the appeal, the cases of Bulman & Dickson v Fenwick & Co [1894] 1 QB 179 and Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1963] AC 691 provided strong implicit support for MUR’s case. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Management won a clean sweep at Whitestone REIT, GrafTech International Ltd., Crown Castle, and Disney despite a recommendation for at least some dissident nominees from ISS and/or Glass Lewis. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Management won a clean sweep at Whitestone REIT, GrafTech International Ltd., Crown Castle, and Disney despite a recommendation for at least some dissident nominees from ISS and/or Glass Lewis. [read post]
Wednesday’s sanctions were imposed on Hong Kong-based companies including GBL International Logistics Co Ltd (GBL), Tavit Hong Kong Co Limited (Tavit), Holden International Trading Limited (Holden), Taube Precious HK Limited (Taube) and VPower Finance Security Hong Kong Limited (VPower). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
  _____________________________ [1] See 395804 Ontario Ltd. [read post]
  [1] Montres Breguet SA & Ors v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd & Anor ([2023] EWCA Civ 1478) [2] Cases C‑148/21 and C‑184/21 – not binding on the Court post-Brexit but was persuasive because of the shared legal precedent between the UK and the EU pre-Brexit. [read post]