Search for: "Williams v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm."
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Driehaus, 814 F.3d 466, 476 (6th Cir. 2016); 281 Care Comm. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
Williams, 150 N.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Trump, and others discussed taking to social media to encourage Trump supporters to march to the Capitol on Jan. 6. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Ohio, 495 U.S. 103, 110 (1990) (likewise); United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Public Disclosure Comm'n v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
The Second Circuit’s Decision The Honorable William J. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Because of the limited punishments that can be imposed, "[c]riminal defamation defendants are not entitled to a trial by jury" and "state law does not afford indigent criminal defamation defendants the right to court-appointed counsel. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Coble, as well as my student Sara Williams—so arguing, and urging the Ohio Supreme Court to hear the case (Rasawehr v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376, 390 (1973). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The EEOC filed suit alleging, among other things, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8(c), prohibits the tribal hiring preference contained in the Peabody leases. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
§ 30104, right to recover in negligence against his or her employer. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Madden ("Madden") back pay, front pay, and compensatory damages on his claim that CWS terminated his employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
In City of Chicago v. [read post]
