Search for: "Xerox Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Xerox Corp., No. 3:21-CV-1085). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119, 123 (2d Cir. 1930) (Hand, J.). [2] In re Trasylol Prods. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Xerox Corp., No. 3:21-CV-1085). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. 2003), where the Fifth Circuit reversed summary judgment for Xerox on a reverse discrimination claim, the court noted that “[s]enior staff notes and evaluations also indicate that managers were evaluated on how well they complied with the [diversity] objectives,” among other factors. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
Xerox Corp (1987), a collective action was “conditionally certified” based upon a lenient standard. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm
Xerox Corp., 118 F.R.D. 351, 361 (D.N.J. 1987), which most district courts have since adopted. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:57 am
Xerox Corp., permits court-authorized notice to be sent to an initial, “conditionally certified” group of individuals based on allegations that the individuals were subject to a single decision, policy or plan by an employer. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 10:30 pm
Declarations Are Often Limited in Scope & Content The USPTO Director issued a precedential decision last month in Xerox Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:15 am
The PTAB held in IPR2022-00624 that Xerox Corp., et. al. failed to show that there was a reasonable likelihood it would prevail in proving unpatentability of the challenged claims of Bytemark, Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:15 am
The PTAB held in IPR2022-00624 that Xerox Corp., et. al. failed to show that there was a reasonable likelihood it would prevail in proving unpatentability of the challenged claims of Bytemark, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:55 am
Xerox Corp., which is currently […] [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
The case stems from a challenge by former Xerox Corp. chief financial officer Barry Romeril, who sued for the ability to deny the Securities and Exchange Commission’s fraud allegations after he signed a 2003 settlement with the agency. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:46 am
Xerox Corp., 118 F.R.D. 351 (D.N.J. 1987) set out the ubiquitous two-step process for certifying collectives under FLSA: a conditional certification stage and a final certification stage. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
Marvin Ginn Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:38 am
Xerox Corp., 118 F.R.D. 351 (D.N.J. 1987), in which the Court crafted a two-step certification process for an FLSA collective. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:09 am
Xerox Corp. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
“The slickest way in the world to lie is to tell the right amount of truth at the right time-and then shut up. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm
But someone needs to look at, Xerox Corp. v. [read post]
