Search for: "Young v. Douglas Co." Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In the course of our correspondence, Dennis Nichols shared his recollections of his interactions with the very young David Egilman. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that occurred… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Young suggested that perhaps the SILS test was akin to cold fusion. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
The Getting Into Equity paper was part of the Notre Dame Law Review's federal courts symposium issue on equity, and it had a stellar set of scholars writing on equity (Rachel Bayefsky, Seth Davis, Kellen Funk, John Harrison, Andrew Kull, Michael Morley, Jim Pfander and Peter Douglas, Fred Smith, Mila Sohoni, and Ernie Young). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:39 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
Anello of Douglas & Loundon, P.C., and Paul Pennock of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., as co-lead counsel. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Her most recent book, Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights (co-authored with Michael C. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
She also became the co-author of a textbook on sex discrimination and the law – the first of its kind. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But even then, insurers imposed co-pays and other cost-sharing devices that shifted much of the cost of birth control to patients. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 666 [1st Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted].) [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
As the judge, Douglas Campbell, noted "the young children may not be paying very much attention to the trade marks, the packaging, or indeed anything at all in their enthusiasm to play with the goods in question. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Louisiana law, which Thomas also cited in her lawsuit, is more or less the same as federal law with respect to pregnancy discrimination.)The Meaning of the PDA’s Second Clause and Young v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Erickson, “Interpretation of recurring weak associations obtained from epidemiologic studies of suspected human teratogens,” 46 Teratology 69 (1992); Mark Parascandola, Douglas L Weed & Abhijit Dasgupta, “Two Surgeon General’s reports on smoking and cancer: a historical investigation of the practice of causal inference,” 3 Emerging Themes in Epidemiol. 1 (2006); David Sackett, R. [read post]