Search for: "Zani v. Zani" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2023, 4:27 am by SHG
After all, who would believe that when ChatGPT tells you that Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:44 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The fact that the case has taken so long to decide tells you there's a likely intense, behind-the-scenes disagreement among judges over how to proceed.There's little scientific justification remaining behind the central tenets of Zani v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 10:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"A Farmer's Branch police officer who'd never hypnotized anyone before failed to follow a number of mandatory requirements under Texas Court of Criminal Appeals jurisprudence in Zani v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals approved the use of hypnosis in a case called Zani v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
From the Netherlands, patent attorney Bart van Wezenbeek (V.O.) took advantage of the "no-patent" instruction as follows: A talented kitten called Katedisclosed her invention on a dateHer tomboy said “Cool,But you’re such a fool.Since for patenting it is now too late”.Charles Quekett's offering is zany enough to qualify for publication: A talented kitten called Kate,Her oppositions were always just too-late.She gave ‘drid a ring;Changed… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I just wanted to thank the many people who helped me with Obsidian Finance v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:05 am by Robin E. Shea
The plaintiff in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:24 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
More Fosler trailer Grants/Summary Dispositions . . . . and those zany AF Capital Appellate Counsel are at it again. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:32 am by webmaster
  Just when reflexive references to “winning” and Sheen’s conspicuous zaniness had become conclusively played out, Sheen has made real, though sparsely-covered news with the Los Angeles Superior Court’s recent ruling in Sheen v. [read post]