Search for: ""duty to warn""
Results 181 - 200
of 1,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 7:18 am
Giant Eagle’s Propositions of Law Accepted for Review Proposition One For stores that provide motorized carts to disabled shoppers, the Eighth District created entirely new tort duties owed by them—a duty to warn the user about the obvious danger of a pedestrian-cart collision, a duty to train disabled customers how to operate a simple motorized car, and a duty to interrogate customers to determine whether their disability disqualifies them… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:32 am
Because the danger at issue was open and obvious to the child’s father, the defendants did not have a duty to warn the father about the lack of a seat on the zip line. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am
Accordingly, summary judgment based on there being no duty to warn was vacated. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 11:58 am
The court also declined to recognize a duty to warn the decedent of drive-by shootings. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 5:58 pm
§ 29-28-103 (2012), several defendants affirmatively negated their alleged duty to warn, and the plaintiffs presented insufficient evidence of causation with respect to some defendants. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 6:33 am
Employers generally have a duty to warn their misbehaving employees that they need to improve or they will be terminated for cause. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:46 pm
Employers also have a duty to warn about latent defects of which it is or should be aware in tools it supplies. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
The court explained that a landowner owes an invitee two distinct duties: 1) the duty to maintain the premises so that it is in reasonably safe condition and 2) the duty to warn of any hidden dangers. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:52 am
also, the court opines that there is no claim in the complaint for breach of duty to warn. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 10:39 am
Nevertheless, the court says that Amazon voluntarily assumed a duty to warn the plaintiff by sending the December 12 email, “which plainly sought to warn her of the dangers posed by the hoverboard. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:13 pm
” Continue reading › The post Does Amazon Have a Duty to Warn Maryland Customers about Dangerous Products? [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Related blog posts: $5.09 Million Jury Verdict for Negligent Use of Surgical Tack Applier Used to Secure Surgical Mesh Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Physician and Pharmacy Have No Duty to Warn of Medical Risks Associated With Long-Term Use of Reglan $105 Million Jury Verdict with Punitive Damages for Misdiagnosis of Cancer and Fraudulent Cancer Treatment The post $2.4 Million Jury Verdict in Failure to Evacuate Stomach Contents Before Lap Band Surgery appeared first on… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Roe’s decision to ignore the manufacturer’s warning constituted gross negligence, the Doe family claimed. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:45 pm
It held that when Amazon chose to send the email to the one plaintiff, and in so doing sought to warn her of the dangers posed by the hoverboard, it assumed a duty to warn. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:42 pm
The appellate court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the trial court’s refusal to submit the requested instruction to the jury was erroneous, noting that the trial court gave the jury an instruction that set forth a property owner’s duties, including the duty to warn of hidden defects. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:00 am
As for Rent-A-Center, it had no “duty to warn” Vintage of the upcoming deadline. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:00 am
The learned intermediary doctrine helps courts decide which participant in the chain of administering prescription drugs to consumers should be charged with the duty to warn patients about the potential adverse effects. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:51 am
The Respondents are 500 individuals claiming that under state law, Merck, Sharp & Dohme had a duty to warn them of potential femoral fractures. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Raymark Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 793, 797 (4th Cir. 1990)). [4] § 388 Chattel Known to Be Dangerous for Intended Use, Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965). [5] Under New York law, for instance, the duty to warn in strict liability is identical in nature and scope as the duty in negligence. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
(finding no duty to warn of the inherent dangers of motorized carts.) [read post]
