Search for: "*u. S. v. Hope" Results 181 - 200 of 958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 12:37 pm by Daniel Nazer
It is tempting to hope that the court’s ruling will only apply to 271(f) cases. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This court agrees with Starmark.Yes, there was reference to i4i:This court has long held that because “[u]nder 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am by David Post
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm by Steve Minor
I hope that whichever side loses the case will file for rehearing and get amicus briefs from the specialty bar groups to address the Supreme Court's questions at the argument. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:41 am by Kali Borkoski
Why should the Court’s ability to reach a fully informed decision be compromised by a failure of advocacy, such as occurred to everyone’s embarrassment in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
He hoped his book would go some distance in educating the public. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In this brief essay, I try to draw some connections between the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Hope not Hate issued a statement entitled “Hope not Hate Wins! [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
See John McKay, Train Wreck At the Justice Department: An Eyewitness Account, 31 Seattle U. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:36 pm
So, I hope this helps, and I hope that you're able to work out your case without this interfering. [read post]