Search for: "2012-B Property Holdings LLC"
Results 181 - 200
of 293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
B. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Leach Builders, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
§ 102(b)based on pre-critical date batches of ANGIOMAX® producedby BVL for Medicines. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm
Chase Home Fin., LLC, No. 11-cv-142, 2011, WL 4950111 (D. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
” Rebelution, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
”) Cranberry Fin., LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted)." [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm
District Court in as many days, the court in Tetris Holding, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm
This doctrine holds that “[w]hen a senior user of a mark on product line A expands later into product line B and finds an intervening user, priority in product line B is determined by whether the expansion is ‘natural’ in that customers would have been confused as to source or affiliation at the time of the intervening user’s appearance. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
We hold that it is not. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm
As discussed in the opinion, the precedents set by Pepsi-Cola and Flamingo Hilton-Laughlin have led to divergent decisions in subsequent cases (see, e.g., Shadyside Hospital (April 19, 2013) (holding that under Pepsi-Cola, a rule banning usage of the company logo in social media posts without written permission is unlawful because restricts Section 7 rights) and General Motors, LLC (May 30, 2012) (finding a similar bar on usage of the company logo lawful under… [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
Cir. 2012), and 707 F.3d 1295 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Id. 6.202(b). [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
B. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm
Taking a problem-solution approach to define what is “new and useful” is precisely the type of analysis that Judge Chen applied in DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
You might think that our next intellectual property (IP) case, Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
B ¶¶ 49, 53. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
” Ms Kireeva’s counsel pointed to the case of Re Kooperman [(1928) 13 B&CR 49] (“Re Kooperman”) as an example of the court granting such relief. [read post]
