Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs in Evenwel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:07 pm
The full opinion in AC Ocean Walk LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:04 am
Co., AC 31317 (Conn. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 3:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
AC has not agreed to withdraw its tariff application. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
And it is a decade now since the seminal decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:55 pm
It states, very astonishingly, in is Notice of Application that:3. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valencia v Llupar [2012] EWCA Civ 396 (30 March 2012) Al -Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 358 (29 March 2012) Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 379 (29 March 2012) Berky, R (on the application of) v Newport City Council & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 378 (29 March 2012) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
Where its employee speaks on matters of public concern, the government bears the burden of justifying any adverse employment action [Rankin v McPherson, 483 US 378].It was undisputed that many federal and state laws require ACS and HRA records, reports, and information relating to specific children or families, be kept confidential. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:01 am
The massive destruction of Syrian government forces through three hours of sustained bombardment by the United States Air Force – B52s, F-15s, MQ-9s, Ac-130s, AN-64 Apache helicopters – on the night of 7-8 February resulted in the deaths of at least a hundred Russian mercenaries, if not more (figures of 300 or more are being bandied about.) [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm
The decision of the House of Lords in Limbuela (R (on the application of Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2005) UKHL 66, (2006) 1 AC 396) is quite clear on this point; as Lord Hope pointed out “The question whether, and if so in what circumstances, support should be given at the expense of the state to asylum seekers is, of course, an intensely political issue” And, he went on to say, engagement in this “political”… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:34 am
Kapnick issued a scholarly decision for a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department in Estate of Calderwood v ACE Group Int’l, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 08750 [1st Dept Dec. 14, 2017]. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
- AC has replied on January 8, 2014 to Prof. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Rooker-Feldman only applies when you're a "state court loser," which is why it doesn't apply in this case.The case is Green v. [read post]
