Search for: "Ackerman v Ackerman"
Results 181 - 200
of 444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
We can draw a rough distinction between standard and unconventional approaches to the study of constitutional change outside the formal amendment process enshrined in Article V. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:07 am
A cause of action alleging professional malpractice against an accountant accrues upon the client’s receipt of the accountant’s work product (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 8; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541; CRC Litig. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 10:23 am
In the case of Center Partners, LTD v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm
At Ackerman Law Office we routinely handle uninsured and underinsured claims. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 10:18 am
In Supreme Catering v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:45 am
See Ackerman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
See Ackerman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
In an accounting malpractice action, the limitations period is measured from the date the client receives the accountant’s advice and/or work product (Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541-543 [1994]). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Corp. v Bistricer, 133 AD3d 435, 436 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:25 pm
In acknowledgment of our readers' Second Amendment rights, and until such time as District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
Darby Scott, Ltd. v Michael S. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:58 am
Darby Scott, Ltd. v Michael S. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:08 am
“A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court'” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301, quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm
Ackerman, Gorsuch found that Fourth Amendment protections apply in instances where a person or organization is searching emails on behalf of the government. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 3:50 am
More specifically, the cause of action “accrues upon the client’s receipt of the accountant’s work product since this is the point that a client reasonably relies on the accountant’s skill and advice” (id. at 8, quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
From all reports, Ackerman said something like: “wrong questions, wrong data, wrong theory,” and then imploded in frustration. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm
" (Ackerman v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Fisher v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
Hood v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:45 am
At Ackerman Law Offices we actively pursue and understand traumatic brain injuries. [read post]
