Search for: "Adams v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania" Results 181 - 200 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Klee (General Electric) | September 8 As this year marks the thirtieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
The Court also heard oral arguments in Perez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
(Baryla Decl., ¶ 6; Morris Decl., ¶ 5; Declaration of Robert Adams ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction, ¶ 3; Declaration of Jeffrey Mullen ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction, ¶¶ 3-4.) [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
”  The Court also issued orders yesterday morning, including one that sent the case of Michael Ballard, a Pennsylvania death row inmate who told the Court that he had not authorized his attorney to seek Supreme Court review, to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for investigation or other action. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
It was a busy, if not particularly momentous, day at the Supreme Court yesterday. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Today at 10:30 a.m. the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Chicago attorney Jeffrey Nowak of Franczek Radelet on the firm’s blog, FMLA Insights Reebok Gets Fit with an Intense CrossFit Sponsorship – New York lawyer Ronald Urbach of Davis & Gilbert on his blog, Madison Ave Insights Come and Get Us: States in No Hurry to Respond to Supreme Court Ruling on Aggregate Limits – Washington, DC attorney Larry Norton of Venable on the firm’s Political Law Briefing UAS “Freedom of the Press! [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:59 am by Dan Ernst
Asking why marriage has been such a stubborn feature of American entitlements programs and of citizenship, she explored the 1977 Supreme Court case Fiallo v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
  The Supreme Court itself abandoned his distinction a few years later in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:48 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
 - The Georgetown Supreme Court Institute. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Holder on June 25, 2013, part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was invalidated by the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
 In 1989, the Supreme Court appointed Roberts to argue his first case before the Court, United States v. [read post]