Search for: "American Electric Company v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
In that case, American Meat Institute (AMI) v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Court, SD California 2014 http://t.co/31LZrVSucU -> Public and private cooperation necessary to fight cybercrime http://t.co/eh0yDrilSt -> Canada set to begin Patent Prosecution Highway pilot program with EU http://t.co/4zsj2n5FNl -> Key Aspects of the New Reform of the Spanish Copyright Act http://t.co/jR6SSfUbXB -> iiNet and Dallas Buyers Club set for February courtroom showdown http://t.co/gExMj06d8L -> CJEU asked to rule on copyright liability of operators of free and open Wi-Fi… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Dean Foods Company v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am
For example, in Ocean Trail Unit Owners Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Special Electric Company, Inc., 214 Cal. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The PDA was necessitated by a Supreme Court decision two years earlier, General Electric v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
”[2]However, as a matter of law in the United States and Bangladesh, Apparel Mart and the Bangladeshi companies are each viewed as separate legel entities, each wholly responsible for its own activities. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
Since those companies were located outside the United States, the US used criminal prosecutions of their executives, who were then arrested as they happened to set foot in the country, often in transit at US airports. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
<> New Energy Efficiency Standards for Furnace Fans to Reduce Carbon Pollution, Help Americans Save on Energy Bills - The new standard for furnace fans will help reduce harmful carbon pollution by up to 34 million metric tons – equivalent to the annual electricity use of 4.7 million homes – and save Americans over $9 billion in home electricity bills through 2030. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:52 am
Issue: Whether the Clean Air Act, which provides a comprehensive system for the regulation of air pollution in the United States and leaves "no room for a parallel track," American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
Issue: Whether the Clean Air Act, which provides a comprehensive system for the regulation of air pollution in the United States and leaves "no room for a parallel track," American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Bell 13-1013Issue: Whether the Clean Air Act, which provides a comprehensive system for the regulation of air pollution in the United States and leaves “no room for a parallel track,” American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
" EDF Release: Supreme Court Win for Cross-State Air Pollution Rule<> Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> NRDC v. [read post]
