Search for: "Andrew Barnette"
Results 181 - 193
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Barnett may well be right to suggest that in some situations the costs of formal rulemaking could be justified, but he could not be [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:00 am
The photograph of Richard Barnett in Pelosi’s suite of offices in 2021 became one of the defining images of the insurrection. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal With Debate Deal, Trump and Biden Sideline a Storied Campaign Institution DNyuz – Adam Nagourney (New York Times) | Published: 5/16/2024 The agreement by President Biden and Donald Trump to move ahead with two presidential debates, and sideline the Commission on Presidential Debates, is a debilitating and potentially fatal blow to an institution that had once been a major arbiter in presidential politics. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Solum Legal Theory Blog Georgetown M Deepak Gupta Consumer Law & Policy Blog Georgetown F Nan Hunger Hunter of Justice Georgetown M Adam Levitin Credit Slips Georgetown M Brian Wolfman Consumer Law & Policy Blog Georgetown M Randy Barnett Volokh Conspiracy Georgetown M Dan Ernst Legal History Blog George Washington M Neil H. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm
In November 2023, On Barnett Newman, 1991-2023 marked Diao’s debut exhibition at Greene Naftali. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
I don't know about you, but I find it's difficult to attend all the good panels going on at conferences such as SEALS, where there are simultaneous panels competing for one's attention, not to mention the temptations of the informal schmoozing, and yes, the surroundings. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
As Steve Barnett pointed out in a post last week, the public’s views on privacy are in line with those of the judges rather than those of the Sun. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12, 26/03/2012. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
What Is AI and Why Does It Matter for National Security? [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Among those who were chosen to have their 2019 returns scrutinized was the man who had been Comey’s deputy at the bureau: Andrew McCabe, who served several months as acting FBI director after Comey’s firing. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 7:49 am
Should Maine reestablish parole to correct racial disparities in incarceration rates? [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am
The Biden administration is reportedly considering shifting its position on the International Criminal Court (ICC) by providing support to the Prosecutor’s investigation of Russian war crimes in Ukraine. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:41 pm
The Leveson Inquiry continued the examination of the relationship between the police and the press, with appearances from deputy London mayor Kit Malthouse (pictured), the regional press, a number of chief constables from regional forces and the Independent Police Complaints Commission. [read post]
