Search for: "Appeal of the Austin Company"
Results 181 - 200
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 1:15 pm
The Third Court of Appeals allowed a hotel company the sale-for-resale exemption for non-reusable, consumable items like shampoos, shower caps, notepads, and pens that it provided for its guests. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Pfizer has said it will appeal the Philadelphia jury's recent $9.45 million verdict. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:46 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 07-16423. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 9:30 pm
Austin Powder Co., 68 NY2d 465 (1986), the New York Court of Appeals ruled: An insurer has no right of subrogation against its own insured for a claim arising from the very risk for which the insured was covered. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:20 am
Majority [pdf] and dissent [pdf] Also see eBay’s Rule 202 Appeal. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:39 am
But because partner and group moves typically entail lengthy negotiations, no such limit applied, Austin & Devon claims. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
Epic Games is a video game company that makes the popular Fortnite game among other products. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
In 2003, the Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin, decided a case that discusses what constitutes "negligent misrepresentation". [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled that the ordinance violates the First Amendment, but during over 90 minutes of oral argument in City of Austin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:02 pm
The company and its lawyers (led by John Hutchinson and John Lavelle at Sidley Austin) appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that courts should not be able to force a company to provide drugs to patients before they are sure about their safety. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
But if the judge rules against defendant, the trial goes on, and the defendant isn’t entitled to immediately appeal; the defendant has to wait for the appeal until after trial, when the losing party can indeed appeal. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 7:52 am
Oyewole appealed but now the Second Circuit has upheld that ruling, saying that his arguments are “without merit. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
Keisler of the Washington, D.C., firm of Sidley & Austin. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:03 am
A 2000, Austin Court of Appeals found in Stumph v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
While performing its obligations under the company’s contract with Austin Bridge, Hayward incurred higher-than-expected cement costs, which the River Authority refused to reimburse the company for. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:23 am
Could companies have it right? [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:18 pm
In 2008, the Superior Court Judge Robert Austin ruled that CH2M Hill was negligent in its design changes to the digester. [read post]
