Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 181 - 200
of 551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 6:20 am
In Aubin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
In fact, product liability law often follows a “needs of the many” approach that supports research, development, and limitation of liability for prescription medical products, where large damage awards can occur in the Wink of an Eye and can result in The Doomsday Machine for such products. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:46 am
The case, Aubin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:13 am
In another victory for the injured victims of our State, yesterday the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion in a products liability case, Aubin v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 8:39 am
The products liability lawsuit stemmed from 16 latent-injury silicosis cases filed by workers in Mississippi against a now-defunct Florida company. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:24 am
Smith was exposed to dust as a result of the use of asbestos products at the railroad yard, which included exposure to dust from the neighboring facility that made asbestos insulation. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:24 am
Smith was exposed to dust as a result of the use of asbestos products at the railroad yard, which included exposure to dust from the neighboring facility that made asbestos insulation. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
Private nuisance: Again, the general rule is that a seller of a product is not liable for a private nuisance caused by the use of that product after it has left the seller’s control, a rule that has been applied in asbestos cases, “even though that hazard exists even with the intended use of the asbestos-containing product. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm
Allen, has now reduced Plaintiff’s claim to one alleged corrective disclosure related solely to the allegations regarding asbestos liabilities. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Nothing resembling this mass consolidation has been seen on the federal level in some twenty years since appellate courts stepped in and called a halt to jumbo asbestos consolidations in Cimino v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
The Court did not overrule Basic v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:56 pm
Plus, notwithstanding limiting instructions, the breadth of liability evidence tends to expand with each plaintiff. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
Cutler, “Motives of Tobacco’s Experts Questioned by Study,” BNA Snapshot -Product Safety & Liability Reporter (July 20, 2015) [cited as Cutler]. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:51 pm
In Dugas v. 3M Company, a man filed a lawsuit in Florida against several companies over his alleged exposure to asbestos fibers while serving in the United States Navy. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
A verifiable alternative cause could be a game-changer for asbestos litigation. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
Fitzpatrick, “Digging Deep to Attack Bias of Plaintiff Experts,” DRI Products Liability Seminar (2013). [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:06 pm
Blommer v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:00 am
Court Rejects Scientific Theory in Asbestos Litigation; Betz/Simikian v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
Judge Johnson is not only an accomplished writer of historical fiction, but he is also an astute evaluator of the facts and data, and the accompanying lawyers’ rhetoric, thrown about in pharmaceutical products liability litigation. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 3:42 am
Kaenzig and Linda Kaenzig filed an asbestos litigation complaint asserting claims of negligence and products liability against several defendants, including Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. [read post]
