Search for: "Bray v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Sam Bray points out that the “Supreme Court said two interesting things about equity [last] week”; he notes that “the takeaway from the court’s opinion” in an election-law case, North Carolina v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:37 pm by Danielle D'Onfro
On Wednesday, October 16, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Rotkiske v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:01 pm by Dan Gauss
  Police seizure of text messages violated 4th Amendment, judge rules [Ars Technica – Jon Brodkin] Savage's decision in State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
According to Koppelman's concluding paragraph, here is what originalists like Barnett, Bray, Sachs, Baude, Kopel, and Natelson think: The narrative is clear. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
United States Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, w [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Bray ; updated by Ruby Lieberman..Bray, Ilona M., 1962-Berkeley, Calif. : Nolo, 2010.IndiaHD6189 .P375 2010Working the night shift : women in India's call center industry / Reena Patel.Patel, Reena, 1970-Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, 2010.Intellectual PropertyK1420.5 .D345 2010Copyright, contracts, creat [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]