Search for: "Brazil v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 889
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2021, 12:13 am
In the instant case, the Court of Appeal held that there was no material evidence placed before the court to establish the change of name of the plaintiff-appellant company, and the resolution for change of name in Brazil that was provided before the court was deemed insufficient.[3] In Edicomsa International Inc and Associates v CITEC International Estates Ltd,[4] the plaintiff-appellant was a foreign company incorporated in the United States of America. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
(The announcement also states that “longer term priorities” are Brazil, India, Indonesia and Kenya.). [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 10:01 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am
In University of Rochester v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 1:07 am
In Omni MedSci, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 11:51 pm
Lee Pharma v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 8:36 am
Argentina, LG&E Energy Corp v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 4:29 pm
IndiaX v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:40 am
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The leading users of OJS are Indonesia (11,827 journals), Brazil (2,912), and the United States (1,130). [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 12:29 am
Nativa v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
On 25 June 2021 Meade J handed down his decision in the second of a series of trials listed as part of the Optis v Apple UK action ([2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat); a link the judgment is here). [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:33 am
Case date: 11 June 2021 Case number: No. 2020-1760 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:34 pm
Also, in other EPC contracting states it is accepted that national procedural law determines whether reliance on a centrally limited patent is admissible in already pending national proceedings. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:07 am
Mishan & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:13 am
Rajesh Bansal and Koninklijke Philips v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 1:51 pm
European Commission Vice President Věra Jourová says the United States must limit its national security agencies’ access to Europeans’ data before the EU will make a deal on transatlantic data flow of people’s digital information, writes Politico. [read post]
