Search for: "Brown v. State of South Carolina"
Results 181 - 200
of 304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
Browning Editor’s note: The following story is reprinted with permission from the Fall 2013 Texas Entertainment and Sports Law Journal. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
As Lyle reported on August 2, the Court has already declined the state’s request to delay the order (which follows the Court’s 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:45 pm
They had raised the little girl from birth, but then the child was sent to live with her father, Dusten Brown of Bartlesville, Okla., after the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that the transfer was required by a federal Indian child welfare law. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Biology v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:12 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
” Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:44 am
Meanwhile, another federal District Court, in South Carolina, had vacated the Rule in its entirety in April 2012. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:09 am
In the final months of pregnancy, the mother cut off all communication with Brown and worked closely with an agency and attorney to place the child with a non-Indian couple from South Carolina, the Capobiancos. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Brown & Root, Inc., 207 F.3d 717 (4th Cir. 2000); Brown & Kerr Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:54 am
South Carolina law would have permitted the involuntary termination of Brown’s parental rights, but ICWA supersedes state law and forbids such involuntary terminations. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:58 pm
South Carolina law would have worked against Brown as it says that a father's parental rights are terminated if he fails to provide pre-birth support and does not become involved in the child's life shortly after birth. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am
Background In Brown v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Nevertheless, when the constitutionality of Section 5 was first brought before the Court in South Carolina v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
South Carolina (1992) and Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:49 am
Nicastro (South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
John’s UniversityCOMMENT: Deborah Rosen, Lafayette College11:00-12:45: Slavery, Movement, and the Law: New Approaches to Gradual Abolition(hopefully close to the session above)PRESIDING: Daniel Hamilton, University of Illinois “Not very Fanatical on the Subject of Slavery:” Fugitive Slaves and the Persistence of Slavery in New Jersey, 1804-1846 James Gigantino, University of Arkansas The Conflict of Laws in the Crossing of Borders: Slavery and Antislavery… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
State, 332 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976); Walker v. [read post]
