Search for: "Burden v. North Dakota" Results 181 - 200 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
The regressive nature of wireless taxes creates significant burdens on low-income consumers. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:20 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The car involved in the accident was designed in Michigan, assembled in Ontario, Canada, and sold to a dealership in North Dakota. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 27, Oct. 8 and Oct. 15 conferences) North American Coal Corporation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
In an age when members of the public can no longer bestir themselves to leave their vaguely couch-shaped objects to purchase needful items in person, South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
Supreme Court to grant certiorari in the South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
North Dakota, and the inability of legislators, state employees, and citizens to understand the limitations of the Due Process Clause. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  One ground for not allowing plaintiffs to argue that products should be taken off the market altogether is that such after-the-fact recall duties would be excessively expensive:Duties to recall products impose significant burdens on manufacturers. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii,  Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania)  exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota,  and South… [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Furthermore, the Court found the circuit court erred in issuing the injunction as plaintiffs did not meet their burden for injunctive relief. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bill Marler
The number of infected persons identified in each state was as follows: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), California (4), Colorado (40), Idaho (2), Illinois (4), Indiana (3), Iowa (1), Kansas (11), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (7), Montana (2), Nebraska (6), Nevada (1), New Mexico (15), New York (2), North Dakota (2), Oklahoma (12), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Dakota (1), Texas (18), Utah (1), Virginia (1), West Virginia (1), Wisconsin (2), and Wyoming (4). [read post]