Search for: "C & D Holdings, LLC"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 2:20 pm
And, for good measure, the examiner refuses registration based on 2(a) (false connection) and 2(c) (name of a particular individual), both of which can be overcome by disclosing the connection between BGK Trademark Holdings, LLC and Blue Ivy Carter and providing the required consents. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:30 am
C v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 5:27 am
In Andon, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dolgencorp, LLC Pending before the Court was Defendant Dolgencorp, LLC’s (Dollar General) Motion for Summary Judgment, seeking an Order holding that Plaintiff, a “Store Manager” was subject to the Executive Exemption to the FLSA, and not entitled to overtime compensation. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 27, 2022 - 2 PM: D&P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
Supp. 3d 665, 704–705 (D. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
Fairmont Holdings, LLC, Appeal No. 2016-1089 (Fed. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 12:02 pm
P. 26.1(c). [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 12:02 pm
P. 26.1(c). [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
This structure holds you as the center of the business, and does not create a separate legal entity. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:28 am
I’d be surprised if that’s what they do, but only time – 30 days from November 20, 2013, to be precise — will tell. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
Supp. 2d 971, 976 (D. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
;d) engaging in family-type activities by jointly attending family functions, holidays and celebrations, social and recreational activities, etc. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 3:42 am
Clear Choice Holdings LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:17 am
The district court explained that "[s]ignificant to the analysis here, '[a]ctions that aid and abet in violating the injunction must occur after the injunction is imposed for the purposes of Rule 65(d)(2)(C).' Blockowicz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:20 am
Day, Judge.Representing Appellant: Sky D. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
The appellate panel in Shapiro rested its holding on LLC Law § 402 (c) (3) which speaks to the majority’s right not only to adopt an operating agreement but also to amend it subject, of course, to any contrary provision in the operating agreement and certain statutory carve-outs in LLC Law § 417 (b). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 12:36 am
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A# (2) Exhibit B# (3) Exhibit C# (4) Proposed Order)Debtors' Objection to Motion of Summit Distribution, LLC for Entry of an Order (i) Compelling Immediate Payment of its Administrative Expense Claim Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:42 pm
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G)TerreStar Networks Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:42 pm
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G) TerreStar Networks Inc. [read post]
