Search for: "COURTNEY v. COURTNEY" Results 181 - 200 of 458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Courtney Bowman
Courtney Bowman Now that it’s been approved by the EU Parliament’s Civil Liberties Committee, Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR” or the “Regulation”) is well on its way to replacing the 20-year-old Data Protection Directive (the “Directive”) as the EU’s omnibus data protection law. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
US rock star Courtney Love has paid a high price of well over $750,000 in total for things she’s written on social media – the first a rant on Twitter about how she was billed for custom clothing by designer Dawn Simorangkirn that cost her $430,000 in a defamation damages payout. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
’s Introduction: “Alabama Legal History as a Field of Study”Warren Hoffman: “Developments of the Enclosure Movement in Alabama: Disrupting the Free Roaming”Paul Rand: “Flush Times in the Chancery: A Brief Note on the History of Equity and Trusts”Helen Eckinger: “The Militarization of the University of Alabama”Eddie Lowe: “Economic Growth in Blount County: Attorneys, Companies, and Cases”Mike Dodson: “Pioneers in Alabama Legal… [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States It is reported that Courtney Love has settled the second Twitter defamation claim brought against her by paying the sum of $350,000. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 10:34 pm by Jasmine Joseph
Wayne Courtney, Associate Professor, University of Sydney, and Prof. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 3:26 am
Wayne Courtney, Associate Professor, University of Sydney, and Prof. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:16 am by Courtney Bowman
Courtney Bowman In a move that may strike fear into the hearts of mobile phone owners everywhere, the Sixth Circuit recently ruled that a person’s “pocket dials” – those inadvertent calls made from a person’s mobile phone, generally when the phone is in its owner’s pocket, and alternatively referred to as “butt dials” – may not be entitled to an expectation of privacy. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:33 am by Jon Hyman
I thought I’d try something different today by bringing you a musician I’ve recently discovered—Courtney Barnett. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:17 am
[Article 2.2 of the Services Directive expressly excludes a number of services from its scope, including "(d) services in the field of transport, including port services, falling within the scope of Title V of the Treaty". [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Turza Angie’s List’s Telephone and Fax Information Services May Be Immunized by Section 230–Courtney v. [read post]