Search for: "CROSS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
” California Law Lawyers argue for a living. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
The prosecutor in the case of Giles v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:07 am
By Martin Stratte for Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP In August 2018, the California Court of Appeal decided Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:26 am
In Wanke, Industrial, Commercial, Residential, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
In the recent case of Castro v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:33 am
In Edmond Carmona, et al v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 8:19 am
In Milo Thompson v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Free Stream Media Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 2:42 am
Storek v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:58 pm
Blue Cross only moved to rescind the policy after the plaintiff sued. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In a case that is important to those whose religious beliefs prohibit consumption of meat or pork products, a California federal district court in Amin v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:05 pm
In Giles v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
California Supreme Court opens door for state reimbursing local agencies for unfunded mandatesDepartment of Finance v Commission on State Mandates, California Supreme Court, S214855Source: Meyers Nave Legal Alert A Meyers Nave Internet Newsletter reports that on August 29, 2016 the California Supreme Court handed a victory to local agencies that are seeking to enforce their constitutional right to reimbursement for unfunded mandates imposed by the State. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 11:54 pm
First, it observed that unlike other cases where a waiver was found (e.g., Mike Davidov v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:25 pm
Supreme Court decision Beecher v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
In Laffitte v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
California, 127 S. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:15 am
“Hayward” is a city in California; it is a surname; it is also the trademark for the Complainant in Hayward Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
