Search for: "Campbell v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 2,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of Google… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
That test is a crystallisation of a process first articulated in Campbell the same year (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457), a case I’ll come back to. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:51 am by Guangjian Tu
[v] Hence, the finality of arbitration award is overall enshrined in England. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 1:27 pm by Stéphane Erickson
Footnotes [1] 2021 ONSC 5961. [2] Steve Livshin v The Clinic Network Canada Inc, 2021 ONSC 6796. [3] See also: Campbell-Givons v Humber River Hospital, 2021 ONSC 6317. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Prime, in turn, placed the commercial general liability policy with the defendant State National Insurance Company (hereinafter SNIC), an insurance carrier. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In addition, the trial court stated the California Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Supreme Court suggests that the ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages generally should not exceed 9:1 (State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 5:47 am by Florian Mueller
I'd be surprised if the FRAND trial really had to be held next year.The winning lawyers are Douglas Campbell QC, Joe Delaney and Maxwell Keay (instructed by Gowling WLG).Plaintiff-friendly SEP enforcement rules are settled case law not only in the UK after Unwired Planet but also in Germany, where Sisvel v. [read post]