Search for: "Carr v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND For" Results 181 - 200 of 321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
| Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz.Never too late 86 [week ending on Sunday 6 March] – Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41 | The IPKat team: news, new arrivals and farewells | CJEU in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM | World IP day | Advocate General's opinion in Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe in Austro-Mechana | EPO v trade union | OLG… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
” With the redistricting process drawing nearer, Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice argues that although the Court “struck a major struck a major blow for political democracy a half century ago by establishing the ‘one person, one vote’ rule for electoral districts” in Baker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:18 am
The district court denied this motion. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Daniel Tokaji
Carr, which declared that the courts could entertain malapportionment claims, and then in Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by John Lewis
Posted by John LewisA divided Sixth Circuit panel affirmed the district court decision in EEOC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Yahoo News, Roger Parloff reports that the court’s decision whether to “wade into the inherently political quagmire of district mapping” in Gill v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am by Robert Brammer
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland found that the decision to use burn pits was made by the military. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
The district court adopted the magistrate's findings; a conditional plea followed. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The 7th District Court of Appeals, however, applied legal precedent from a Sixth Circuit (federal) Court of Appeals case (Andrews v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:37 am
“Beverage Holdings I” (Beverage Holdings, L.L.C. v. 5701 Lombardo, L.L.C., 2017-Ohio-2983- Vacated): The Eighth District Court of Appeals in Beverage Holdings I, initiallyagreed and affirmed the trial court’s decision.In so doing, it reiterated the general law of commercial contract interpretation in Ohio, citing several Ohio Supreme Court and Eighth Appellate District decisions. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:18 am by Florian Mueller
Google argues that the class action lawyers went too far, and on that basis has appealed to the Ninth Circuit the district court's decision to certify a consumer class:Ninth Circuit appeal no. 22-80140; Mary Carr, et al v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Wagner 14-615Issue: Whether a district court judge may recall a jury on discovery of its own error in the receipt or recording of a jury's verdict and, if the jury has remained an undispersed unit within the court's control since discharge, may accept its verdict. [read post]