Search for: "Chew v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 7:41 pm
Federal sentencing fans should check out all the proposed priorities, but these proposals seem especially notable and valuable: Continuation of its work on federal sentencing policy with the congressional, executive, and judicial branches of the government, and other interested parties, in light of United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:05 pm
While there is much to chew on in the Federal Circuit opinion in Highmark v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:24 pm
The federal banking regulators, joined by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, hurled down from Mt. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
This drama has plenty to chew over: whether a chocolate twig is devoid of distinctive character; whether such shapes should be kept free for use by others; whether twig shapes are such as to give value to the product in question. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:12 am
American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The panel discussion was on the doctrine of equivalents following the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
The Chief Executive Office of TikTok, Shou Chew, stated that the company will be challenging the constitutionality of the law. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
See Eurowest Cinemas LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
Morse v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Topps Chewing Gum, 202 F2d 866 (2d Cir. 1953).) [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> El Comite el Bienestar de Earlimart v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Now the Court either needs a little bit more time to chew on that recommendation, or perhaps clerks are busily vetting it for a grant. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:43 am
I still need to chew this through. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:00 am
So you then need to go to case law to see how the courts interpret and apply that distinction.A seminal case distinguishing a food from a drug is Nutrilab, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
The T-shirts commercialized by the defendant company, in which Audrey Hepburn is represented with her middle finger up or covered in tattoos or with big chewing-gum bubbles, were very successful, and even the orders placed by the claimants were actioned late due to the need of re-stocking the items.The cease-and-desist letters sent by Hepburn's sons were devoid of effect. [read post]
