Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:37 pm by Schachtman
Advance Auto Parts, No. 431525 California Superior, Los Angeles Cty. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
(lead case), Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles and ECUSA v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am by Jon Gelman
It marked a huge victory for 10 California municipalities — including Los Angeles County, and the cities of San Francisco and San Diego — that will be able to draw on the fund for home inspections and repairs if the ruling holds up.In the 114-page decision, Santa Clara Superior Court Judge James P. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:05 pm by Robert Kreisman
  The next bellwether trial is set to begin in January 2014 in Los Angeles. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 3:12 pm by David Kemp
Huy Hong Foods Inc., filed in the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles hereThe post Sriracha Factory Emitting Noxious Fumes, Lawsuit by City Alleges appeared first on Justia Law, Technology & Legal Marketing Blog. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:14 am by David DePaolo
City of Los Angeles (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 143:"The fact the City provides volunteer reserve officers with workers’ compensation benefits if they sustain industrial injuries does not change the fact they serve without remuneration. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:14 am by David DePaolo
City of Los Angeles (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 143:"The fact the City provides volunteer reserve officers with workers’ compensation benefits if they sustain industrial injuries does not change the fact they serve without remuneration. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:25 pm by Jon Gelman
The cities and counties — Santa Clara County, San Francisco City, Alameda County, Los Angeles County, Monterey County, Oakland City, San Diego City, San Mateo County, Solano County and Ventura County — filed their 52-page statement of decision with the Santa Clara County Superior Court Friday. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sunnyvale City Council (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1351 and Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]