Search for: "Cleverly v. Cleverly"
Results 181 - 200
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1474 (21 December 2010) Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 December 2010) Francis, R (on the application of) v West Midlands Probation Board [2010] EWCA Civ 1470 (21 December 2010) Safeway Stores Ltd & Ors v Twigger & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 (21 December 2010) The Scout… [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:11 am
The whole thing is worth reading, but here’s a snippet: As the Supreme Court explained in Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm
Ivy Press v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:20 am
In National Association of Realtors v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
., v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
I also thought the Supreme Court was wrong (and Justice Thomas right) in US Term Limits v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See Morgan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:12 pm
Chancellor Chandler's opinion in eBay v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm
A few days ago, District Judge Christina Snyder issued her 57-page ruling in American Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:08 am
Somerfield, rather cleverly, applied for a summary judgement to dismiss the grounds of opposition which would have left the way clear for them to be granted a new tenancy. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:08 am
Somerfield, rather cleverly, applied for a summary judgement to dismiss the grounds of opposition which would have left the way clear for them to be granted a new tenancy. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
Consider the ruling in a 1985 UK case, Lion Laboratories v Evans, [1984] 2 All ER 417, [1985] QB 526. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am
Brandchannel.com: Ambush Marketing Steals the Show Ambush marketing – a term often hissed in industry circles – occurs when one brand pays to become an official sponsor of an event (most often athletic) and another competing brand attempts to cleverly connect itself with the event, without paying the sponsorship fee and, more frustratingly, without breaking any laws. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am
Though this prompted large sporting organisations such as FIFA and the IOC (International Olympic Committee) to adopt anti-ambushing strategies, ambush marketing has become more and more widespread, possibly because for some companies it is the only way to compete.To protect official sponsors, event organisations can insist on certain criteria being fulfilled before a city or region are considered or awarded a major event.Brandchannel.com:Ambush Marketing Steals the Show Ambush marketing – a… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 pm
Brandchannel.com: Ambush Marketing Steals the Show Ambush marketing – a term often hissed in industry circles – occurs when one brand pays to become an official sponsor of an event (most often athletic) and another competing brand attempts to cleverly connect itself with the event, without paying the sponsorship fee and, more frustratingly, without breaking any laws. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:40 pm
Of particular interest to the Pomerantz firm, the legislators began negotiations on reform measures that would overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Stoneridge v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm
The difference in presenting data to a jury v. to a judge is a big one. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:20 am
an op-ed Turow wrote back in 2000 shortly after the Supremes decided Dickerson v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:28 am
Sudeer v. [read post]
