Search for: "Cohen v. Davis"
Results 181 - 200
of 316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
” At Bloomberg BNA, Chris Marr looks at American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen and Fuad Rana, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, January 22, 2024 Tags: Cybersecurity, ESG, Human capital, Public Companies, public company enforcement, SEC Indexing and the Incorporation of Exogenous Information Shocks to Stock Prices Posted by Randall Morck (Alberta School of Business) and M. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:52 am
In Swanson v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:52 am
In Swanson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen and Fuad Rana, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, January 22, 2024 Tags: Cybersecurity, ESG, Human capital, Public Companies, public company enforcement, SEC Indexing and the Incorporation of Exogenous Information Shocks to Stock Prices Posted by Randall Morck (Alberta School of Business) and M. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm
SSRN Next week in the courts On 18 February 2014 there will be an application in the case of Davis v Ames. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
* Cohen v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
V. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
See Order Regarding Permanent Injunction, Chamber of Commerce of the USA et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Wade, Lawrence v. [read post]
