Search for: "Cola v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Coach v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
Bowring v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm
United States Supreme Court Indicates Possible Intention to Grant Certiorari in Magee v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 8:48 am
In the recent case, San Joaquin County Correctional Officers Association v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
Habrá grandes colas para la cebolla, el tomate, la papa y el ajo. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:57 am
Coca-Cola Co., No. 10-21418, 2011 WL 744098 (S.D. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 12:44 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 134 S. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:39 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 134 S. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:39 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 134 S. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Chamberlin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:57 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Pepsi Cola Co., 650 F. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:44 pm
NOTE: For an in-depth discussion of the above-principles, read Shaup v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:02 am
Of course, 'the court and its personnel' are usually allowed recipients but that phrase does not mean 'the court, its personnel, and the public.' Otherwise, the recipe for Coca-Cola or any other highly private information could be blurted out in open court. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
The fact that COCA COLA and PEPSI may be registered trademarks does not mean the government has endorsed these brands of cola, or prefers them over other brands. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
More systematic research bears this out in some ways: recognition/recall is better; to the point that consumers shorten Chevrolet to Chevy and Coca-Cola to Coke. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:01 am
The Board cited the case of Janocha v. [read post]
