Search for: "Commonwealth v. Grant, R."
Results 181 - 200
of 686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:31 am
Justice Hughes concurred in the result only, while Justice Wright filed a separate dissenting opinion (Kentucky Restaurant Association v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:15 am
In reversing Lane’s conviction, the appeals court relied on its own precedent in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am
The cases in which permission has been granted are as follows: R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor Cheshire East Borough Council R (Cardiff & Vale University Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors Miller & Ors v Ministry of Justice; O’Brien… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
” (Batson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
The Supreme Court has recently granted him permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in the related case of R (Bancoult (No 3)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] EWCA Civ 708. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:31 pm
§§1321-24]’s definition of “current employee” means former employee, as was held by the Commonwealth Court in this case when it erroneously relied on nonprecedential dicta in an earlier Commonwealth Court decision (Beitman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
Lucido v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
Late in 2014, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to clarify the dimensions of the Illinois Commerce Commission’s authority, allowing a petition for leave to appeal in the FutureGen case – Commonwealth Edison Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
., and other Commonwealth countries. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
Commonwealth (Ky. 1822). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:04 am
In a June 8, 2016 Opinion in the case of Astleford v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:13 pm
Facts of the Case In a recent (unreported) case from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Appeals Court, Villanueva v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:48 am
And while we won’t know Judge Sullivan’s reasons for granting the preliminary injunction blocking the Staples/Office Depot merger (FTC v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:45 am
To the extent the State relies on Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
R v Docherty, 3-4 May 2016. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:47 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Moreover, because Section 636(a) expressly incorporates any authorities granted to magistrate judges by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, . . . the Court's analyses of whether the NIT Warrant was statutorily permissible and whether it was allowed under Rule 41(b) are necessarily intertwined.U.S. v. [read post]
