Search for: "Cool v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
Co-director of enforcement Stephanie Avakian touted the Cyber Unit’s second ICO enforcement action, stating: “We will continue to scrutinize the ICO market vigilantly for improper offerings that seek to sell securities to the general public without the required registration or exemption. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
United States, 136 S.Ct. 2272 (2016) • M. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:09 am
United States, and you can check out SCOTUSblog’s coverage here. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Under United States Supreme Court precedent, it is relatively easy to sue police officers who commit misconduct, but federal law still provides enormous protections to prosecutors. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 10:17 am
United States, a case I have discussed on this blog many times. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:47 pm
What follows is the response of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba to the decisions by the United States government to reduce the size of its diplomatic mission in Cuba and the consequent decision to expel a substantial number of Cuban diplomats in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
(Isn’t Professional Responsibility just unbearably cool? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:56 am
United States District Judge Paul A. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:56 am
United States District Judge Paul A. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 168 (1962)). [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
England is trying to catch up with Ohio and the rest of the United States when it comes to Family Law. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am
But isn’t the EEOC there to speak for the United States? [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:52 pm
I have read with attention what has been written in Mexican news outlets, which mainly criticize the position of the United States and suggest defending this instrument. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
So let’s be cool, not hot. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
Indeed, because consumers may be particularly vulnerable to deceptive acts from traveling salespersons who enter their home, consumers may rescind any transaction with a door-to-door salesperson during a three-day cooling-off period. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
So while in 2012 ‘intrusion upon seclusion’ may have found favour with Whata J, this could be the fullest extent to which New Zealand courts adopt the United States’ Restatements torts (sourced from Harvard Law Professor William Prosser’s seminal 1960 article). [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
6 May 2017, 5:24 am
Hold my beer, the United States Supreme Court replies in Tolan v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm
At the end of President Hillary Clinton’s first one hundred days in office, the possibilities for sober governance look farther away than ever—even though the president herself has been a model of restraint and coolness under immense pressure.People who have tried to say that a hypothetical President Trump would have caused even more insanity are hard-pressed to come up with believable narratives of a country in serious turmoil. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
