Search for: "Cooper v. Cook"
Results 181 - 200
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
Comerford, 49 A.D.2d 818 [1975]; Singer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
It was submitted that the High Court accepted in Cook’s case that a “s 62G inquiry involves or may involve the parties seeking legal advice as to whether they can or whether they may or may not answer questions”. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 4:54 pm
JamaicaRobinson v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:52 am
Hughes and Stephen Hughes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:47 am
Thus, the record was sufficient to present triable questions of fact regarding the employee’s wrongful discharge, IIED, and conversion claims (McManus v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:40 am
Castro, March 1, 2016, Cooper, C.). [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Bradwell v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am
” Department of Transp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The first such study was completed in 1981, but encountered such poor cooperation from participating officers that the data were deemed unsuitable for analysis.5 Presumably because of this initial negative experience, subsequent field testing locations were chosen largely based on the cooperation and support of the administration and officers that would carry out the testing ("…only agencies that could assume an extremely high… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
You can be sanctioned for not cooperating after that point but you can’t be defaulted. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
You can be sanctioned for not cooperating after that point but you can’t be defaulted. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
Chief Justice Recuses in New Wyeth Case The National Law Journal The Supreme Court on Monday announced it was granting review in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:11 pm
” Wilson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
Joe Klein, Senator Government V. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Blum v. [read post]
